The Maltonian Website - for Malton School
Maltonians document archive - John Estill Solicitor's Papers
An Enquiry
1834
A booklet of some 20 pages, printed by Smithson's in Malton, I am guessing written by William Pound, the schoolmaster from 1835 - 1866.
The document sifts through the Foundation document, looking for clues as to the intentions of Robert Holgate, in particular as to whether the Old Malton School should be open to residents of New-Malton, Norton and other outlying areas, and whether only Greek Latin and Hebrew should be taught.
Considerable research has gone into the document, and presumably some expense in getting the pamphlet printed.
AN ENQUIRY
INTO
THE FOUNDATION
OF THE
FREE GRAMMAR SCHOOL,
IN
OLD MALTON
FOUNDED BY
ROBERT HOLGATE, ARCHBISHOP OF YORK
IN THE REIGN OF KING EDWARD VI
FOR THE EDUCATION
IN LATIN. GREEK AND HEBREW
OF
"SCHOLARS THITHER REPORTING"
MALTON,
PRINTED AND SOLD BY R. SMITHSON, IN YORKERSGATE.
1834
An enquiry having been instituted into the extent of the Foundation of Old Malton Free Grammar School, founded by archbishop Holgate in the reign of king Edward VI., to ascertain the rights and privileges granted thereby, and more particularly those of the inhabitants of New-Malton, the following facts and remarks are respectfully submitted to the attention of every one whose interests it may concern.
The preamble of any grant in a written act or deed shows generally the intention and views of the grantor: It is therefore the first enquiry which demands attention. In the foundation deed of Old-Malton School, the words of the grantor are
"Whereas it hath pleased the King our late Sovereign Lord Henry the Eighth of most famous memory, by the Grace of God King of England, France, and Ireland, Supreme Head, deceased, of His most Godly Zeal and Affection towards the increase of Learning, and bringing up of Youth in Virtuous Exercise, in His Grace’s Realm of England and other His Grace’s Dominions, to freely Give and Grant to Me the said Archbishop by His Grace’s letters Patent dated the 24th of October in the 38th year of His Grace’s Reign, full authority, licence, power and free liberty to erect, establish, make and order Three several Free and Perpetual Grammar School, that is to say – One within the Close of the Cathedral, or Metropolitan Church of York, or in the City of York – One other at Hymsworth in the West Riding or the County of York – and the Third in Old-Malton in the North Riding of the said County; of the several Schoolmasters and their Successors for ever; and to be called the Free Grammar School of Robert Holgate, Arbp. Of York, in the City of York, Hymsworth and Old-Malton aforesaid, and the same Schoolmasters, to be three several Incorporations, to sue and be sued by the names aforesaid, and to have three common Seals, every One of them one, and to continue in succession for ever according to such constitution, ordinances and Rules as shall be therefore devised and made by me the said Archbishop of York. And further to Give Lands and Tenements to the clear Yearly value of twelve pounds sterling. And to the Schoolmaster of the said School in Hymsworth aforesaid and his Successors, Lands and Tenements to the clear yearly value of twenty four pounds over and above all charges and reprises. And also the Schoolmaster of Old-Malton and his Successors Land and Tenements to the clear yearly value of twenty pounds sterling, over and above all charges and reprises, as more plainly and at large appeareth by the aforesaid Letters Patent."
5 "Know ye, that the said Archbishop of York by the Mercy and inestimable Goodness of Almighty God, and to His Honour and the increases of Virtue and Learning and for the Commodity and Profit of the King’s Majesty’s Subjects, Church Inhabitants of this His Grace’s Realm of England, by virtue of the said Letters Patent, by this present Writing Do Constitute, order, erect, establish, make and declare the Erections, Foundations, Rules and Ordinances of the Free and Perpetual School of Old-Malton aforesaid as hereafter ensueth, that is to say:
First, I Order, Constitute, Make, Establish and Erect, that One Perpetual and Free School of Grammar, from henceforth being in Old-Malton aforesaid, of ONE Schoolmaster and his Successors in one House there for that purpose by me provided. And so to continue from One Schoolmaster to Another in succession for ever, TO TEACH GRAMMAR and OTHER KNOWLEDGES and GODLY LEARNING in the same School, FREELY without taking any STIPEND or other EXACTIONS of the SCHOLARS or any of them, THITHER RESORTING to learn and know the same."
The statutes or rules of the foundation do not mention either the schoolmaster or the scholars until the NINTH rule, which says "And further I will and Ordain that the said Schoolmaster shall be conveniently seen(?) in the HEBREW, GREEK and LATIN TONGUES, and shall teach and inform the same to such scholars in the said School, as shall be most mete and fit for the same according to the discretion of the said Master. And CHIEFLY and PRINCIPALLY I Will and Ordain that the said Schoolmaster shall be well seen and have good knowledge and understanding in the LATIN TONGUE and GRAMMAR, and shall generally to ALL SCHOLARS THITHER RESORTING for the same, duly read and teach GRAMMAR, and other Good Authors of the LATIN TONGUE, and Authors translated into Latin, as the same Scholars shall be able and apt to receive the same, according to the Ordinances and Rules as I shall hereafter make and appoint for the same: And if I make no Rules and Ordinances therefore, then according to the discretion of the Schoolmaster of the said School for the time being."
Rule 10th "And further; I Ordain and Constitute, that the said Schoolmaster and his Successors shall continually have under them in the said School One person to be USHER in the said School to teach such Children and Scholars in the said School of the lowest Forms as to him shall be appointed by the said Schoolmaster and his successors."
In the 26th. Rule the founder of the school says "And further, I Ordain, Will and Constitute, that if any Scholar, resorting to the abovesaid School for learning, will not be ordered in lawful causes, concerning his studies and learning thereof, or concerning his honest manners, or reasonable correction, that then the said Scholar shall be put forth and banished from the said School, and not suffered nor permitted to study or learn in the said School until he have submitted himself to the said Schoolmaster, to abide his order for Offences before committed."
Rule 33. “And further, I Ordain and Constitute that the said Master and his Usher shall cause their Scholars, and every of them to use and exercise WRITING of their LATINS and Lessons of their own hands. And further; that neither the said Master and his Successors nor the Usher at the said School for the time being, shall be bound by this foundation to teach any Scholar, BUT ONLY SUCH AS CAN READ, but shall either weekly or daily, by the discretion of the said Master and his Successors appoint some of their Scholars to hear and teach them."
The preceding extracts from the foundation deed of the free school in Old-Malton contain every word found therein respecting the scholars entitled to be educated in that school on that foundation free from any "Stipend or Exaction." – It will be observed that there is no limitation expressed of the use and benefit of this school to any place or town whatever. Education in "Grammar and other Knowledges and Godly learning" is by the first rule and ordinance to be afforded to "the Scholars thither resorting" without paying any "Stipend or Exaction" for their education; and the ninth rule confirms this more expressly as to the system of education and the scholars to be taught, "The Master is to teach Hebrew, Greek, and Latin to All Scholars thither resorting"
Can any explanation be required of the intent and meaning of the most charitable and right reverend founder of three free grammar schools at York, Hemsworth and Old-Malton, more than is given by the connexion of the words "All the Scholars thither resorting" – "the King’s Majesty’s Subjects, CHURCH a handwritten note suggests this is a misread by the printers, and should be the Inhabitants of His Grace’s Realm of England". Yet doubts have been expressed how far the privilege of education in the free school of Old-Malton extends, and objections have been made to extending the privilege to NEW-MALTON, because New-Malton being situated so near to the school, and from its population more extensively interested in the privilege of the freedom of the school than any other town in the vicinity, has not been even named by the founder in any part of the foundation deed; and other towns, Norton, Settrington and Appleton are united with Old-Malton parish in certain duties required by the founder. From this fact it is contended that New-Malton is intentionally excluded from any participation in the free benefit of the institution, and not only from the free benefit, but entirely from any benefit, for the master is strictly enjoined to give all his time and attention, even including Sundays, to the FREE scholars, and also is positively debarred and prohibited from receiving any stipend or exaction for teaching any scholar.
This erroneous objection, for such will it appear, arises from confining the words "Old-Malton" to the town and not including the parish, which is always added by the founder when any duties are required from the inhabitants; and likewise probably in some persons from not knowing that the town or borough of New-Malton is situated within the parish of Old-Malton, which made it unnecessary to mention the chapelries, that only recently established as parochial chapels. The chapels of St. Michael and St. Leonard in New-Malton, are chapels of ease to St. Mary’s, the mother church at Old-Malton, and are now parochial chapels of ease, although originally only CHANTRY CHAPELS. St. Leonard’s chapel was erected to supply the place of the chantry chapel of St. James in the castle of New-Malton, and the date of the first register book for that chapel to record baptisms, marriages and burials is A.D. 1600. The first register for St. Michael’s chapel begins A.D. 1570, for the same purposes.
The earliest mention of these chantry chapels is by LELAND in his Itinerary, undertaken the latter end of the reign of king Henry the Eighth. He says "The Towne of Malton both two Chapelles in it as members to the Paroche Chirch of Malton yet standing where the late Priory in Old-Malton was." – These chapels were endowed with lands and houses situated in Old and New Malton, and Malton field and Broughton. – CHANTRY CHAPELS were built by pious persons for the saying and singing of masses therein for their own souls and the souls of their families. There chantry chapels were probably founded and endowed by the Bromfletes and Veseys, the great proprieters of Malton, and estates in Yorkshire, and the known founders of other chantry chapels and monastic institutions. One of the Veseys founded Old-Malton priory in the reign of king Stephen. The following is an extract of leases granted by queen Elizabeth, of the chantry lands, &c. once belonging to the chantry chapels in New-Malton:-
"Augmentation Office in the Reign of Queen Elizabeth." – "Particulars for Leases in the North Riding of the County of York." – "Parcel of the late Chantry of St. James within the Castle of New-Malton in the County aforesaid:" then follows a recital of separate Leases, in number "nineteen," of lands and houses, amounting in yearly payments to "seven pounds sixteen shillings and two pence."
"Parcel of the late Chantry Lands, &c. of St. John Baptist, within the Chapel of St. Michael, in New-Malton, in the said County of York." – "Only two Leases in this Chantry, of lands formerly belonging thereto, the yearly value, two pounds."
"Parcel of the late Chantry or Chapel of St. Michael, in New-Malton aforesaid, founded for One Chaplain to serve there." Only one lease, value yearly, sixteen shillings – These particulars were prepared for granting a lease of the whole property to "Thomas Spenser and Ralph Rayon, men of good substance in Malton," "examined 20th. January, 1568, Anthony Rone, Auditor, and on the 18th. February, 1562, by Anthony Robinson, for the Tenants."
Another "particular for Leases" in the same reign, says
"County of York. Parcel of the Lands and Possessions of the late Chantry of St. John Baptist, within the Chapel of St. Michael, of New-Malton.
"One Farm, One Messuage and One Oxgang of Land situate in the Town and Fields of Old-Malton, yearly value twenty shillings." "The fine A different connotation at this time - an amount to be paid by a tenant to a landlord after four years Rent. "
In the Domesday Record, compiled in the reign of William the first, "TWO MALTUNES" or two divisions of the same town are described, and in ONE MALTUNE there is a CHURCH and a mill; this church must have been erected at some period in the Saxon Heptarchy, and the foundation of the outer walls, including pillars, were discovered and traced in the garden of the Priory Grange, by the late George Watson Esq. then resident there. The lower part of the shaft of one pillar he left standing on its foundation, with its capital near it on the ground, where the pillar at least yet remains. In this record we do not find any mention of any CHAPELS in either Malton, we must therefore conclude that the chantry chapels in New-Malton were erected subsequent to the compilation of it, which confirms the opinion before given, that they were founded by pious persons and endowed with lands and houses for the maintenance of a chaplain or chaplains, whose duty it was to say masses for the souls of the pious founders; such chapels were generally attached to some monastic institution at the first, and afterwards made chapels of ease and parochial chapels to the mother church.
The inhabitants of these chapelries had, (long after) the privilege granted, A.D. 1650, of burying within the chapels, (neither of the chapels having then any burying ground attached) by Sterne, archbishop of York, on paying certain mortuaries in the said grant directed; one half of which was to be paid to the minister of the "Parochial Church" at Old Malton, for the repairs and ornament thereof; the other moiety to be applied to the repairs and ornament of the chapel in which there might be any interment. Persons refusing to pay the mortuaries not to be allowed the privilege, but "shall cause their dead to be buried in the church or church-yard at Old-Malton, according to ancient custom."
In the year 1720 a burying ground was annexed to St. Leonard’s chapel, and it is remarked in the register that in the first graves dug, "human bones were found. " The burying ground has been twice enlarged for the use of the increased population of both chapelries.
The curate of Old-Malton is appointed by the Right Honourable the Earl Fitzwilliam, and is always the curate of the chapelries in New-Malton. – Divine service was performed alternately in Old and New-Malton; when the service was at Old-Malton in the morning it was at New-Malton in the afternoon, and vice versa every Sunday. It was alternate also at the chapels. For additional divine service on Sundays in the town of New-Malton, the late Earl Fitzwilliam, in consequence of a petition signed by many inhabitants, for divine service in the chapels both morning and afternoon of every Sunday, kindly directed that fifty pounds yearly stipend should be paid to an additional curate for the extra duty. The residence of the curate of Old and New-Malton has always been in New-Malton, the parsonage house is in New-Malton; there is not, and it is not known that there ever was, a parsonage house in Old-Malton.
The parsonage house is now become so dilapidated that it is not fit for the residence of the curate, and is at present let to two tenants for a shop, &c. The front of the house is in a style once thought respectable. The father of the Rev. T. T. Walmsley, D. D., rector of Hanwell, Middlesex, was the last curate who resided in the parsonage house. This clergyman, Dr. Wlamsley, is one of the most active friends in support of the establishment of national schools, and was the first honorary secretary to the society in London for those highly beneficial institutions; he was born in the parsonage house, now so lamentably neglected and dilapidated.
When the monastic and chantry institutions were dissolved the king, Henry the Eighth, directed that churches and chapels of ease should be erected where by these dissolutions inconvenience might arise to public worship. The chantry chapel of St. Michael, and the new chapel of St. Leonard, erected in the place of the chantry chapel of St. James, in the Castle of New-Malton, appear to have been, in consequence of the king’s direction then first made chapels of ease, at least they cannot be traced to an earlier origin as chapels of ease.
An Act of Parliament having been passed for registering marriages, and authorizing marriages by a civil contract, we find in New-Malton a register book entitled "A Register Book to commence Sepr 8 and 20th Day, 1653, for the TOWNES and PARISHE OF NEW and OLD-MALTON and precincts thereof, in pursuance of a late Act of Parliament entitled an Act touching Marriages and a Register thereof, and also touching Births and Durials, and for the performance thereof Robert Blackwell, Gent. Of New-Malton, is by the Election of the Inhabitants of the said Parishe appointed Register the 6 and 20th. Day of October, 1653."
"Upon consideration of a Certificate bearing date the 8th day of October, 1653, in those words following, We whose names are ereunto written have made choyce of Mr. Robert Blckwell, who we suppose is able to effect the place of Register for our PARISHE of MALTON, given under our hands the day and year above-named." The following are the names, and principally inhabitants of New-Malton:
John Stockell. Thomas Pye. Chr. Wake John Harrison, Lanc. Thorp. FrancisRobinson, Francis Rymer, Rob. Browne, George Horsley, John Usher, Matthew Preston Robert Boyes, Robt. Welburne, Hy. Stephenson, Wm. Chance, Tho. Milbourne, Michael Firbank.
I Luke Robinson, of Thornton Risbrough, Esq. one of the Justices of the Peace for the said North Riding, do hereby authorize and approve of Robert Blackwell above-said to be Register as desired.
N.B. The signature is in the hand writing of the Justice. "LUKE ROBINSON."
The next entry is a register that Robert Blackwell was SWORN into the office "FOR THE PARISCHE OF NEW AND OLD_MALTON." "Townes" not being mentioned.
To the registry of marriages is annexed in succession the following justices’ names in their own hand writing:
Chr. Percehay, Henry Hall, Arthur Noel, Rd. Etherington, all in the year 1653 – Sir Wm. Strickland, Bart. Jo. Bourchier, in 1654 – Wm. Weddell, Luke Robinson, Matw. Betwith, in 1655 – Wm. Ayscoughe, 1656 - &c. and the last is signed 1658, May 25, Chr. Percehay. Some of the marriages were published three times at the market cross in New-Malton. All the registers are intitled "Register for the PARISH OF NEW AND OLD-MALTON."
The following is called "A True Copy of the names of such well-disposed persons as did voluntarily contribute to the repairs of the Parish Church of Old-Malton, being almost ruined in the Civil Wars from 1648 to 1671, with their several contributions received and bestowed 161, and 1672."
| £. | s. | d. | |
| Lord Archbishop of York | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Wm. Palmes, Esq | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| Mrs. Palmes, his Wife | 5 | 0 | 0 |
| y* Lady Hebblethwaite, of Norton | 3 | 0 | 0 |
| Wm. Mason, Curate | 10 | 0 | 0 |
| Mr. Thomas Langley | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mr. John Blakestone | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mr. Timy. Portington | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mr. Robt. Rymer | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mr. Alex. Metcalfe | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Mr. Cartwright, Schoolmaster at Old-Malton | 1 | 0 | 0 |
This copy contains ninety names of contributors – from ten shillings to one shilling, and some only a few pence, after the names before given, - The whole amount was forty-five pounds twelve shillings and one penny, including the collections made by the churchwardens in Old-Malton of two shillings; and in New-Malton of four shillings and sixpence, from persons not named.
A very large portion of the contributors were inhabitants of New-Malton.
By a register it appears that Old-Malton church pews were first made in 1678, before that year the seats were open and separate stalls, the seats turned up on a pivot to make room for kneeling in them; some of these original stalls yet remain in the church, and shew on the underside of each seat a carving in the wood of some animal, or other device. Several of the pews were built by the inhabitants of New-Malton, who are declared the owners; the following are their names – Mr. Rob. Rymer, Mr. Portington, Mr. Chr. Percehay, Mr. Wm. Mason, James Luccock, Wm. Taylor, John Luccock, John Hood, Edw. Dring.
The inhabitants of New-Malton attend and vote at the town’s meetings in Old-Malton on parish business, as parishioners.
The preceding facts are submitted to the judgement of the public, with the following obseervations. – If any charitable person was now to establish a free classical grammar school in a small country village, inhabited by humble farmers and their day labourers, and appoint a master with two hundred pounds yearly stipend (the proportionate value of twenty pounds in the reign of king Henry VIII.) without charge or reprise, and with a dwelling house, school house, &c.; and also appoint an usher with a yearly stipend of forty pounds, (now equal only to the four pounds given in the foundation deed) and strictly enjoin that neither the master nor the usher should teach any of the children of those humble farmers and day labourers any other language that Latin, Greek and Hebrew, and confine his free school to the inhabitants of the humble village, should we think that such a founder was free from just imputations not very creditable to the soundness of his mental capacity? Yet such would have been the conduct of archbishop Holgate in founding his Free, Latin, Greek and Hebrew School, in the then very humble village of Old-Malton, if he intentionally confined the free school he planted there upon his own property, and probably solely for that reason, not in New-Malton, to the sons of Old-Malton farmers and day labourers; and excluded the sons of the respectable inhabitants of the borough and market town of New-Malton. When also we observe that the archbishop’s foundation deed is witnessed by a Malton gentleman, and other burgesses, would not requesting them to witness, for could they voluntarily witness, the execution of a deed excluding the youth of their town from the benefits of a school so contiguous, in which they might obtain a high classical education, an education not in that day easily obtained; would not such a request appear like premeditated insult, quite inconsistent with a sane and charitable mind, and therefore not merely improbable, but in a moral view, IMPOSSIBLE?
Clauses in the foundation deed, (Nos 19 and 20,) sufficiently shew, that the rents and fines of the estates granted are, before every other object, to be applied to the maintenance of the school and any surplus, of FINES only, to other uses.
The archbishop did not anticipate the great alteration which time has caused in the rents of landed property and the expenses of living, but he clearly intended that the master and usher should have a competent, we may say, a respectable livelihood, for twenty pounds to the master three hundred years ago was a respectable income, we may justly infer that if he had foreseen such a depreciation in the value of money, that he would have directed the incomes of both master and usher to be proportionately increased. Common sense confirms this opinion, and it was the legal opinion of lord Talbot, Feb. 15th., 1731, and again, March 25th., 1732 on two cases submitted to him respecting Old-Malton school, that the master’s and usher’s stipends should be raised pro rata with increased rents.
Subsequent decisions have confirmed this principle, particularly in the case of Hemsworth hospital, founded by the same Archbishop Holgate. The master of the hospital has now a stipend of several hundred pounds yearly, in consequence of improved rents, which before the decree in chancery in his favour was only sixty pounds yearly.
The master of Hemsworth school also receives the full benefit of increased rent arising from the estates at Sinnington, granted by archbishop Holgate to that school.
Should the appointment of a master to the free grammar school in Old-Malton lapse to the archdeacon of Cleveland, he is authorized to act with eight of the best householders in Old Malton parish. And ultimately the appointment met with thirteen of the most honest householders in the PARISH. The words best, honest, and most substantial, are the descriptions of the householders in the parish who are appointed to act in the execution of different trusts in the foundation deed. In the far superior population of New-Malton, compared with the towns of Old-Malton and Wykeham, - (In Domesday Book two Wykehams are mentioned, probably Acomb Crofts, erroneously called Acomb was the site of the other Wkyeham,) in the same parish, a majority may naturally be expected of persons qualified under the description of best, honest, and substantial.
Maltune is twice mentioned in Domesday Book, but without the "Alia," usually means another generally prefixed when separate towns are meant. In both the Maltons or division land is described as appertinent, and far more in extent than is now in New-Malton. No doubt very great alterations took place when the three daughters of lord Vesey married into the families of St. JOHN, CONYERS, and EUER; in the division of property actually made on the marriages of the …m the boundaries of the townships might then, and probably were, allowed. This was in the reign of King Richard II. In the reign of Henry VIII, Malton was in the possession of CLIFFORD, EUER and CONYERS.
In the Magna Britannia, published early in the last century, Malton is there described: “Malton, alias New-Malton, a borough and market town divided into two parts, the Old and New.” From this description, Malton appears to have been one town, as considered as one town divided into two parts. The name New arose, according to Camden, from the rebuilding of the ancient Malton after its destruction in the reign of king Stephen, by Thurstan archbishop of York, and the posse comitatus a group of people mobilized to suppress lawlessness, defend the people of the country raised to dislodge Eustace Fitz John, who held the castle of Malton in favour of David king of Scotland.
Tradition above sixty years ago, said that the present Old-Malton was called Ingtown or Ingstown, and that houses were continued on the south side of the road from New to Old-Malton, which were pulled down, and a wall built along the road, within which a double row of trees was planted between the towns.
It will be observed, that LANDS and TENEMENTS of the then yearly value of twenty pounds sterling above all charges and reprises, are granted to the master, therefore no part of that twenty pounds was liable to pay the usher’s stipend. The estates, now left, from which the master’s stipend arises, were only fourteen pounds originally. Such spoilation of the school property has taken place as to diminish the master’s stipend, and leave nothing for an usher, organist, or any other conditional bequest contained in the original grant.
THE END.
Smithson, Printer, Malton
Links: Malton School | Malton Community Sports Centre | Malton and Norton Memories Facebook page | oldfern.co.uk
Copyright © 2013 Steve Fearnley